| Research on geology, geophysics, and petrology of impact structures (meteorite impact craters) | |||||||
| Search | Visitors | ||||||
|
|
Impact melts from the Rubielos de la Cérida impact basin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
wt.%
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
mean
|
|
|
wt.%
|
bulk-1
|
bulk-2
|
bulk-3
|
bulk-4
|
bulk-5
|
| SiO2 | 59,95 | 59,72 | 59,38 | 57,19 | 59,95 | 59,18 | 59,23 | SiO2 | 56,06 | 58,13 | 53,45 | 54,47 | 19,78 | ||
| TiO2 | 0,24 | 0,24 | 0,21 | 0,20 | 0,23 | 0,20 | 0,22 | TiO2 | 0,33 | 0,34 | 0,38 | 0,45 | 0,24 | ||
| Al2O3 | 20,75 | 19,53 | 19,88 | 21,30 | 23,16 | 18,63 | 20,54 | Al2O3 | 20,91 | 19,76 | 20,40 | 20,96 | 6,34 | ||
| MgO | 7,26 | 7,49 | 7,42 | 6,14 | 6,45 | 8,21 | 7,16 | MgO | 5,81 | 4,77 | 5,24 | 6,14 | 12,62 | ||
| CaO | 0,88 | 1,04 | 0,92 | 0,99 | 1,09 | 1,17 | 1,02 | CaO | 1,48 | 1,56 | 1,72 | 0,98 | 22,56 | ||
| FeO | 1,61 | 1,77 | 1,62 | 1,89 | 1,85 | 1,73 | 1,75 | FeO | 2,00 | 2,70 | 2,76 | 2,49 | 2,68 | ||
| Na2O | 1,92 | 1,87 | 1,82 | 1,63 | 1,56 | 1,66 | 1,74 | Na2O | 0,48 | 1,20 | 0,29 | 0,48 | 0,02 | ||
| K2O | 0,23 | 0,28 | 0,27 | 0,21 | 0,18 | 0,26 | 0,24 | K2O | 0,65 | 1,34 | 0,45 | 0,57 | 1,82 | ||
| Total | 92,84 | 91,94 | 91,52 | 89,55 | 94,47 | 91,04 | 91,89 | LOI | 10,30 | 9,24 | 14,02 | 11,70 | 32,91 | ||
| Total | 98,02 | 99,04 | 98,71 | 98,24 | 98,97 | ||||||||||
| wt.% | grey | grey | grey | grey | grey | mean | ppm | ||||||||
| SiO2 | 56,45 | 56,89 | 58,05 | 59,54 | 57,12 | 57,61 | V | 14 | 21 | 27 | 23 | ||||
| TiO2 | 0,27 | 0,21 | 0,26 | 0,22 | 0,25 | 0,24 | Zn | 36 | 46 | 68 | 81 | ||||
| Al2O3 | 20,81 | 19,88 | 19,66 | 15,99 | 22,74 | 19,82 | Ga | 35 | 38 | 30 | 33 | ||||
| MgO | 6,77 | 6,34 | 7,18 | 6,90 | 5,93 | 6,62 | Rb | 16 | 38 | 5 | 7 | ||||
| CaO | 1,14 | 1,17 | 1,23 | 1,24 | 1,14 | 1,18 | Sr | 492 | 363 | 327 | 364 | ||||
| FeO | 1,68 | 2,18 | 1,63 | 1,51 | 1,79 | 1,76 | Y | 43 | 37 | 32 | 38 | ||||
| Na2O | 1,42 | 1,19 | 1,49 | 0,79 | 1,31 | 1,24 | Zr | 493 | 475 | 491 | 522 | ||||
| K2O | 0,21 | 0,28 | 0,24 | 0,23 | 0,19 | 0,23 | Nb | 56 | 50 | 47 | 53 | ||||
| Total | 88,75 | 88,14 | 89,74 | 86,42 | 90,47 | 88,70 | Ba | 1250 | 171 | 48 | 1034 | ||||
| Pb | 79 | 238 | 29 | 31 | |||||||||||
| Th | 68 | 59 | 64 | 59 |
Opponents of the impact (geologists from the Zaragoza university and the Center of Astrobiology, Madrid, E. Díaz-Martínez, A. L. Cortés, and others) insist on a volcanic origin of the silicate melt, although they never presented any analysis.
The Rubielos de la Cérida silicate glass rocks are clearly not of volcanic origin, due to the occurrence of strongly shocked clasts in the melt. Moreover, if these melt rocks were to represent a deformed ash layer, the rocks should contain pyroclastic fragments and, with respect to an “intermediate“ SiO2-concentration, mafic relic minerals or andesitic rock fragments. Such is clearly not the case. Moreover, the chemical composition should be similar to that of andesites or basaltic andesites. Those rocks, however, generally have distinctly lower contents of Al2O3 and much higher contents of FeO, CaO and (Na2O+K2O) than the investigated silicate melt rocks (a comparison was carried out with all analyses of volcanic rocks given in Wilson [1989]). Furthermore, the melting temperature estimated for the investigated rocks does not really match the temperatures in an andesite volcanic system.
A very special kind of former melt was found within the Barrachina megabreccia. The whitish melt rocks (see images below) are composed of irregular spheroids up to 4 mm in size, which are embedded within an extremely fine-grained matrix. Under the microscope, the spheroids turn out to be globular to amoeba-like calcite particles. They are coarse-grained in their centres and display decreasing grain size towards the rims. Regularly, a perpendicular grain orientation towards the rims is observed. The contact with the matrix is extremely fine-grained (see photomicrograph below). The isotropic glass matrix in part is intensively pervaded by tiny, elongated, sometimes flaser-like microcrystals, often orientated tangentially to the rim of the calcite particles. The whole rock composition yields 52.7 wt.% CaO, 8.3 wt.% P2O5, and 1.5 wt.% BaO (RFA, bulk in Table below). From microprobe investigations, the carbonate of the particles is pure calcite. The glassy matrix mainly consists of CaO and P2O5 (Table below), with minor contents of F (1.0-2.5 wt.%), S (1.1-2.1 wt.%, if calculated as SO3), Cl (0.5-0.8 wt.%) and NaO (0.3-0.6 wt.%). The poor totals of the analyses point to high amounts of light components within the Ca-P-glass, presumably H2O which may have entered the glass during corrosion. The existence of considerable amounts of C or CO2, however, must also be taken into account. Locally, a strong enrichment of Ba and S at the expense of the CaO and P2O5 content is observed, which is lowered to the range of trace elements or below the detection limit, whereas Al2O3 is present in minor concentrations of about 1 wt.%. In part, the Ca-P-glass is recrystallized to form apatite, as verified by x-ray powder diffraction analysis. The diffraction peaks of this apatite, however, are broadened compared to those of a well crystallized one (not shown here), indicating its very low crystallinity (see diagram below). The existence of baryte has also been proved by x-ray diffraction analysis. This baryte may occur as a very fine-grained phase within the Ba- and S-enriched locations in the Ca-P-matrix, detected by microprobe analysis.




A similar melt has been reported for the suevite of the Ries crater. In the suevite, the calcite particles have identical structure and composition compared with the melt rocks of Barrachina (Image below) and are interpreted by Graup (1999) as quench products of a carbonate melt. Different from the Barrachina melt rocks, the matrix in the Ries samples is silicate glass as a result of carbonate-silicate liquid immiscibility. In our case, the melt rock displays a small-scaled immiscibility of coexisting former carbonate melt and phosphate melt.

|
wt.%
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
mean
|
|
bulk
|
| P2O5 | 22,13 | 21,26 | 24,47 | 27,52 | 32,61 | 32,42 | 26,74 | 8,25 | |
| Al2O3 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | |
| CaO | 35,83 | 35,97 | 37,46 | 42,93 | 48,76 | 51,62 | 42,10 | 52,65 | |
| BaO | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 1,47 | |
| Na2O | 0,35 | 0,32 | 0,46 | 0,57 | 0,53 | 0,55 | 0,46 | 0,23 | |
| SO3 | 1,67 | 1,15 | 1,77 | 2,12 | 1,47 | 1,37 | 1,59 | 0,92 | |
| F | 1,57 | 1,56 | 1,02 | 2,26 | 2,24 | 2,39 | 1,84 | n.d. | |
| Cl | 0,62 | 0,71 | 0,50 | 0,79 | 0,49 | 0,55 | 0,61 | n.d. | |
| LOI | 34,31 | ||||||||
| Total | 62,18 | 60,98 | 65,68 | 76,19 | 86,10 | 88,91 | 73,34 | 97,83 | |

As already suggested for the Azuara structure, abundant relics of former carbonate melt are proposed to also occur in the Rubielos de la Cérida impact basin. A carbonate melt cannot be chilled to form glass, but rapidly crystallizes to carbonate again (see, e.g., the discussion by Graup, G. (1999). MAPS, 34, 425-438). Therefore, the origin from a melt can only indirectly be suggested by the occurrence of skeletal, dendritic crystallites, vesicular texture and related features (see, e.g., the discussion on Azuara carbonate melts by Katschorek [1990]).




In the Barrachina megabreccia, white clasts (see image below) are embedded that consist of highly porous material (dry-rock densities of only 1.4 g/cm³ were measured). Only a few rock fragments are interspersed (see image below). Chemically, the white material is nearly pure CaSO4. In thin section, the matrix may show flow texture but is otherwise not resolved microscopically. Mineral fragments, mostly quartz and feldspar, are partly strongly shocked (PDFs, diaplectic glass). Shock effects occur also in minerals of the interspersed rock fragments.
Evidently, the CaSO4 material is not a chemical sediment (gypsum, anhydrite), and a pedogenic origin can likewise be excluded. With respect to the high porosity, the flow texture and the strong shock effects, we suggest the clasts to have formed by crystallization from a shock-produced sulfate melt. The melting point of anhydrite is 1,450°C, a temperature which must have clearly been exceeded to produce the silicate melt in the Barrachina megabreccia. Crystallization from an anhydrite melt is also discussed for material in suevite breccias from the Chicxulub impact structure (Claeys et al. 2003; see http://we.vub.ac.be/~dglg/Web/Claeys/Claeys%20et%20al%202003.pdf ).


The glass to be discussed here is coating a sandstone exposed in the southern part of the central uplift chain of the Rubielos de la Cérida impact basin. The glass has a greenish to whitisch color and is transparent to milky. In thin section, the sandstone shows heavily damaged, and intense cataclastic flow texture is observed to merge with the glass. Quartz grains are strongly fractured and may show multiple sets of planar fractures (PFs) and planar deformation features (PDFs).
Because of the shock effects in the sandstone, a shock origin of the peculiar glass seems reasonable. As an additional possibility, we suggest frictional melting by extreme dynamic metamorphism in the impact event (excavation or - more probably - modification stage when the uplift formed) and the glass to be pseudotachylite.




|
|